Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA15250 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 16 Mar 2002 19:24:23 GMT From: <AaronLynch@aol.com> Message-ID: <cf.1413439f.29c4f44a@aol.com> Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 14:17:30 EST Subject: Re: FW: MD Dawkins on quantum/mysticism convergence To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 113 Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
In a message dated 3/16/2002 11:45:46 AM Central Standard 
Time, Douglas Brooker <dbrooker@clara.co.uk> writes:
>  Lawrence DeBivort wrote:
>  
>  >  Good morning, everyone,From another list...
>  >
>  >      -----Original Message-----
>  >      From: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk
>  >      [mailto:owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk]On Behalf Of nargess
>  >      sabeti
>  >      Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 7:41 AM
>  >      To: moq_discuss@moq.org
>  >      Subject: Re: MD Dawkins on quantum/mysticism convergence
>  >
>  >        Glenn Bradford <gmbbradford@netscape.net> wrote:
>  >
>  >           Richard Dawkins, in a Forbes article written three
>  >           years ago, speaks his
>  >           mind on the notion, popularized by Fritjof Capra
>  >           and others, that the
>  >           science of quantum mechanics is converging with
>  >           religious mysticism.
>  >
>  >           DAWKINS:
>  >           [A] kind of marriage has been alleged between
>  >           modern physics and
>  >           Eastern mysticism. The argument goes as follows:
>  >           Quantum mechanics, that
>  >           brilliantly successful flagship theory of modern
>  >           science, is deeply mysterious
>  >           and hard to understand. Eastern mystics have
>  >           always been deeply
>  >           mysterious and hard to understand. Therefore,
>  >           Eastern mystics must have
>  >           been talking about quantum theory all along.
>  >
>  >           Similar mileage is made of Heisenberg's
>  >           uncertainty principle ("Aren't we all,
>  >           in a very real sense, uncertain?"), fuzzy logic
>  >           ("Yes, it's okay for you to be fuzzy,
>  >           too"), chaos and complexity theory (the butterfly
>  >           effect, the Platonic, hidden
>  >           beauty of the Mandelbrot Set--you name it,
>  >           somebody has mysticized it and!
>  >           turned it into dollars). You can buy any number of
>  >           books on "quantum
>  >           healing," not to mention quantum psychology,
>  >           quantum responsibility,
>  >           quantum morality, quantum immortality, and quantum
>  >           theology. I haven't
>  >           found a book on quantum feminism, quantum
>  >           financial management, or
>  >           Afro-quantum theory, but give it time.
>  >
>  >           The whole dippy business is ably exposed by the
>  >           physicist Victor Stenger in
>  >           his book, The Unconscious Quantum, from which the
>  >           following gem is taken.
>  >           In a lecture on "Afrocentric healing," the
>  >           psychiatrist Patricia Newton said that
>  >           traditional healers "are able to tap that other
>  >           realm of negative entropy--that
>  >           superquantum velocity and frequency of
>  >           electromagnetic energy--and bring
>  >           them as conduits down to our level. It's not
>  >           magic. It's not mumbo jumbo. You
>  >           will see the dawn of the 21st century, the new
>  >           medical quantum physics really
>  >           distributing these energies and what they are
>  >           doing."
>  >
>  >           Sorry, but mumbo jumbo is ! precisely what it is.
>  >           Not African mumbo jumbo but
>  >           pseudosc! ientific mumbo jumbo, down to the
>  >           trademark misuse of the word
>  >           energy. It is also religion, masquerading as
>  >           science in a cloying love
>  >           feast of bogus convergence.
>  >           --
Hi Douglas.
My earlier use of the phrase "the ineffable Quantum of being" 
a few months ago was also in reference to some of the mystical 
interpretations of quantum mechanics.
  
>  and memetics is a science?
Just suppose that Eastern mysticism got attached to quantum
physics in the early days, so that a substantial fraction of
the physicists reading their first quantum physics books were
asked to swallow a lot of mysticism. The word "quantum"
would have gained a very bad reputation among serious
physicists. 
  
>  sounds like the pot calling the kettle black.
Perhaps this is the old strategy of the best defense 
being a good offense. 
--Aaron Lynch
http://www.thoughtcontagion.com
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 16 2002 - 19:44:14 GMT