Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA04124 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 11 Mar 2002 23:38:38 GMT Subject: Re: Cultural traits and vulnerability to memes Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 18:32:43 -0500 x-sender: wsmith1@camail.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-Id: <20020311233241.868551FD45@camail.harvard.edu> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Hi Steve Drew -
>> Hardwiring is not a defense against variance.
>
>Yes it is. It works or it doesn't.
Hmm. I more meant to mean- you can't use variety in behaviors to deny
hardwiring.
>Discovering nothing can still be of value.
Somewhere I saw another quote about that essence of science, and yes, it
certainly is and can.
>> And evolution is a system of developing hardwiring.
>
>It can be, that's why species go extinct. Too ossified to change.
And I more meant to mean, evolution is a system of presenting the
hardware.
Memetics is generally one of the developments in thought that we've
needed once we figured out, if we have figured out, that homo sapiens
doesn't really do instinct any more. Or else we do and we're just too
close to it to see it that way. We'd all like to see the report of an
extraterrestial ethnographer. Well, as long as it wasn't a clam....
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 11 2002 - 23:49:04 GMT