Re: is forgetting adaptive?

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Sun Mar 10 2002 - 14:22:41 GMT

  • Next message: Ned Wolpert: "RE: Rumsfeld Says He May Drop New Office of Influence"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA01294 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 10 Mar 2002 14:27:58 GMT
    Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 09:22:41 -0500
    Subject: Re: is forgetting adaptive?
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    In-Reply-To: <F2455LqN33HFnwpGR88000051da@hotmail.com>
    Message-Id: <480AB16E-3432-11D6-93B1-003065B9A95A@harvard.edu>
    X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Sunday, March 10, 2002, at 07:51 , Scott Chase wrote:

    > If something is no longer current or pressing, why remember it?
    > Wouldn't it be better for this memory (or at least its particulars) to
    > recede, allowing space for newer, more pertinent, information?

    If time would only stand still, we would remember everything.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 10 2002 - 14:47:54 GMT