Re: Why are human brains bigger?

From: Chuck Palson (cpalson@mediaone.net)
Date: Thu May 18 2000 - 15:03:28 BST

  • Next message: Chuck Palson: "Re: Technology vs. culture"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA10555 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 18 May 2000 20:00:42 +0100
    Message-ID: <3923F830.9BCCC3CD@mediaone.net>
    Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 15:03:28 +0100
    From: Chuck Palson <cpalson@mediaone.net>
    X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; I)
    X-Accept-Language: en
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Why are human brains bigger?
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D31CEB1B7@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Vincent Campbell wrote:

    > I don't think culture exists in isolation from, or opposition to, natural
    > selection, only that it exists in addition to natural selection, producing
    > new effects on behaviour that may conflict, or at least problematize,
    > behaviour produced by natural selection.

    Vincent -
    There is another point of view on this represented by Pinker. The cultural
    traits distinctive of humans may, he suspects, be closely tied to changes in the
    brain. He is prompted to say this partly because of the history of cave
    paintings found in Europe. Until recently we figured that Lascaux cave in
    France, about 20,000 years ago, is when the human species may have started doing
    this sort of thing, and since there didn't seem to be any discernable
    differences in brain structure around that time, it was supposed that this
    culture was simply "added" in addition to what was gained from natural selection
    - which is what you posit. But now we know that exactly the same kinds of
    paintings existed in africa 50,000 years before. There is evidently some
    evidence of changes in brain structure that would account for this. (I can't
    find the reference right now.)

    I sure would like to know why you say that culture may "problemtize" or
    "conflict with" behavior "produced" by natural selection. I even have trouble
    grasping what you mean by that. We have made logic by itself a tool that does
    not depend on context. Or, by introducing long term voice communication, we have
    been forced to relate to each other purely by voice without seeing body
    language. I suspect that these are examples of what you are talking about, no?
    And if so, how do these show what you are talking about when you use the words
    problemtize and conflict.

    >
    > I've said elsewhere on this list what I think the next set of questions then
    > are, but I'd acknowledge that if you didn't see this distinction then those
    > questions don't follow, and natural selection answers all the questions.
    > But it seems self evident to me that the distinction is valid, and so are
    > the questions that arise from it. [but I doubt you'll be convinced :-)]
    >
    > Vincent
    >
    > > ----------
    > > From: Chuck Palson
    > > Reply To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > > Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2000 9:48 am
    > > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > > Subject: Re: Why are human brains bigger?
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > Vincent Campbell wrote:
    > >
    > > > I think arguing that animals have cultures is dangerously like
    > > > anthropomorphism.
    > >
    > > I think that arguing that animals don't have cultures is dangerously like
    > > anthropomorphism. The more we study animals, the more we see the
    > > similarities.
    > > There are differences between humans and other species, but they get
    > > really hard
    > > to pin down.
    > >
    > > > As to the group selection thing, well I'm going from the various
    > > different
    > > > statements made to this effect by the likes of Dawkins, and Gould et al.
    > > >
    > >
    > > I would be surprised to find Gould saying this. If you happen to run into
    > > any
    > > references on this, please pass them along.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > ===============================================================
    > > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    > >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 18 2000 - 20:01:09 BST