Re: Rumsfeld Says He May Drop New Office of Influence

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Sun Mar 03 2002 - 19:45:03 GMT

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: Breath Mints: A Hot War for America's Cool Mouths"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA17673 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 3 Mar 2002 19:42:39 GMT
    Message-ID: <003401c1c2ec$05a2a4a0$adb2eb3e@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: <kennethvanoost@myrealbox.com>
    References: <3.0.1.32.20020228161937.00756490@pophost.nor.com.au>
    Subject: Re: Rumsfeld Says He May Drop New Office of Influence
    Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 20:45:03 +0100
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Jeremy Bradley <jeremyb@nor.com.au>

    > At 07:31 PM 26/02/02 -0500, you wrote:
    > Snip....>
    > >There is much to take pride in, and much to cringe about, with the
    > >responses of all the world's peoples to the events of 9/11. Heroes and
    > >scoundrels. And the world has ever been thus.
    > >
    > >Yes, it is time to disengage the scoundrels.
    > >
    > >We have met the enemy.

    > Hi Wade
    > I think that the quotation is - "We have met the enemy, and it is us", but
    > I don't know who said it.

    Hi Jerry and all,

    Yes, that rounds it up for me though !
    The worst enemy is the one within. That was my point in the message I
    sended across, if it ever will. Somebody on his list did mentioned it
    before,
    a policy is something existing out of thousands opinions, America is a
    country, like all others, existing out of millions of people, each one with
    their own ideas, thoughts, traits and habits, but where those others could
    distil something out of those thousands of opinions and ways of seeing
    things and built upon those further, moderate them, modernising them,...
    America did hold on to the believes of the first pelgrims and still stick
    to those.
    America never caught up with time, it is still stuck in the part of history
    where its beginning began. But you gonna argue, but see... look at America,
    it is modern, it has moderated its own existence,... yes !
    No ! America just moderated, modernised the tools to keep its beliefs
    in place. There is nothing really changed, America still sees the world
    from out the perspective of its founders. America is still holding on the
    values, commitments and habits of those people, maybe without realising
    it, but either way, IMO, there can only come harm from it, not joy !

    No offence intented whatsoever !

    Regards,

    Kenneth

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 03 2002 - 19:52:43 GMT