Re: Central questions of memetics

From: Robin Faichney (robin@faichney.demon.co.uk)
Date: Thu May 18 2000 - 18:35:01 BST

  • Next message: Bill Spight: "Re: PHOBIAS"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA10346 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 18 May 2000 18:52:34 +0100
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@faichney.demon.co.uk>
    Organization: Reborn Technology
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Central questions of memetics
    Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 18:35:01 +0100
    X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.21]
    Content-Type: text/plain
    References: <3923C91F.C391AA53@mediaone.net>
    Message-Id: <00051818361906.00537@faichney>
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Thu, 18 May 2000, Chuck Palson wrote:
    >Robin Faichney wrote:
    >
    >> On Thu, 18 May 2000, Chuck Palson wrote:
    >> >But in any event, discovering use value is not tautological because it
    >> >is every bit as falsifiable as Darwin's theory; that's no accident because it is
    >> >an integral part of Darwin's theory!
    >>
    >> I don't see how "use value" for individuals can be an integral part of
    >> evolutionary theory, unless you disagree with all the modern thinking that
    >> says the replicator is *not* the individual, but the gene. (And there also
    >> seems to be an implication that all behaviour is genetically determined,
    >> but maybe your answer to the first question would also answer the second.)
    >>
    >
    >I frankly have difficulty with this aspect of evolutionary theory. Yes, evolution
    >must function on the gene level. But the end result must be reflected in some way in
    >the individual. Individuals who are born without brains don't survive. Individuals
    >who have defective brains - that can't compute solutions to the ordinary situations
    >in life - die pretty fast also. The gene that produced the stupidity dies along with
    >all the other genes. Individuals that carry genes survive if those genes as a whole
    >produce the right behaviors of individuals. So tell me in a short e-mail why, if or
    >how this contradicts the notion that selection takes place at the gene level. Please
    >don't make it a long one because I can't read your long ones any more.

    The Selfish Gene, by Richard Dawkins.

    That short enough for you? :-)

    --
    Robin Faichney
    

    ===============================This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 18 2000 - 18:53:02 BST