Re: ality

From: Francesca S. Alcorn (unicorn@greenepa.net)
Date: Thu Feb 28 2002 - 02:57:31 GMT

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "tumbleweeds?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id DAA07570 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 28 Feb 2002 03:02:53 GMT
    X-Sender: unicorn@pop.greenepa.net
    Message-Id: <p04320419b8a334db757f@[192.168.2.3]>
    In-Reply-To: <20020227031649.66CAB1FD5A@terri.harvard.edu>
    References: <20020227031649.66CAB1FD5A@terri.harvard.edu>
    Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 21:57:31 -0500
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    From: "Francesca S. Alcorn" <unicorn@greenepa.net>
    Subject: Re: ality
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >Hi Dace -
    >
    >>Any data storage system ought to have a minimal level of accuracy far
    >>beyond that of human memory.
    >
    >No argument.
    >
    >But, who ever said that memory is a data storage system to bring it into
    >this comparison?
    >
    >- Wade

    Mightn't it be more a record of lessons learned, rather than actual
    sensory records? Then the learning would be modified, but the
    experiences themselves would be degraded.

    Each new experience would be a sort of software upgrade.

    frankie

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 28 2002 - 03:13:04 GMT