Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id DAA07570 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 28 Feb 2002 03:02:53 GMT X-Sender: unicorn@pop.greenepa.net Message-Id: <p04320419b8a334db757f@[192.168.2.3]> In-Reply-To: <20020227031649.66CAB1FD5A@terri.harvard.edu> References: <20020227031649.66CAB1FD5A@terri.harvard.edu> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 21:57:31 -0500 To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk From: "Francesca S. Alcorn" <unicorn@greenepa.net> Subject: Re: ality Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
>Hi Dace -
>
>>Any data storage system ought to have a minimal level of accuracy far
>>beyond that of human memory.
>
>No argument.
>
>But, who ever said that memory is a data storage system to bring it into
>this comparison?
>
>- Wade
Mightn't it be more a record of lessons learned, rather than actual
sensory records? Then the learning would be modified, but the
experiences themselves would be degraded.
Each new experience would be a sort of software upgrade.
frankie
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 28 2002 - 03:13:04 GMT