Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA06571 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 27 Feb 2002 20:41:31 GMT Message-ID: <003e01c1bfce$8c18faa0$1387b2d1@teddace> From: "Dace" <edace@earthlink.net> To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> References: <20020227031649.66CAB1FD5A@terri.harvard.edu> Subject: Re: ality Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 12:37:14 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> Hi Dace -
>
> >Any data storage system ought to have a minimal level of accuracy far
> >beyond that of human memory.
>
> No argument.
>
> But, who ever said that memory is a data storage system to bring it into
> this comparison?
>
> - Wade
It's the standard view. I'm not sure who first came up with the idea
(Turing? Von Neumann?) , but it's now deeply ingrained in the modern
outlook. So much so that to question it has become taboo.
Ted
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 27 2002 - 20:51:31 GMT