Re: Words and memes: criteria for acceptance of new belief or meme

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Thu Feb 21 2002 - 00:51:40 GMT

  • Next message: Dace: "Re: ality" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id AAA16218 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 21 Feb 2002 00:56:51 GMT
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:51:40 -0500
Subject: Re: Words and memes: criteria for acceptance of new belief or   meme
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <p04320402b89995864b55@[192.168.2.3]>
Message-Id: <2A9664EB-2665-11D6-8E05-003065B9A95A@harvard.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481)
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    On Wednesday, February 20, 2002, at 07:35 , Francesca S. Alcorn wrote:

    > Nothing wrong with a good argument.

    But that's not what I paid for.... also ;-)

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 21 2002 - 01:06:40 GMT