RE: Words and memes: criteria for acceptance of new belief or meme

From: Lawrence DeBivort (debivort@umd5.umd.edu)
Date: Mon Feb 18 2002 - 23:20:33 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: Words and memes: criteria for acceptance of new belief or meme"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA08179 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 18 Feb 2002 23:48:07 GMT
    From: "Lawrence DeBivort" <debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Words and memes: criteria for acceptance of new belief or    meme
    Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 18:20:33 -0500
    Message-ID: <NEBBKOADILIOKGDJLPMAEEGBCLAA.debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
    Importance: Normal
    In-Reply-To: <JJEIIFOCALCJKOFDFAHBKECMEGAA.richard@brodietech.com>
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Good lucid discussion, Richard. Many thanks. Religion and these narratives
    (I can think of many non-religious narratives that do this, such a
    mountaineering, sports competitions, awards, etc.) would thus seem to be
    things that we create to give meaning to life, to explore our values and our
    dilemmas -- i.e. areas of experience in which the 'proffs' of science don't
    help much...

    Lawrence

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
    > Of Richard Brodie
    > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 6:13 PM
    > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Cc: Level-3
    > Subject: RE: Words and memes: criteria for acceptance of new belief or
    > meme
    >
    >
    > [Philip]
    > ><<Religion, cults
    > >and other pathological idealogies are founded on
    > >fantasy.>>
    > >
    >
    > [Richard]
    > >Would most people (even scientists) consider religion to be a
    > pathological
    > >ideology? On the contrary, it is usually atheism that is considered
    > >pathological.
    >
    > [Keith]
    > <<See my recent posting on this subject.
    >
    > Of course, when you understand what makes lightening, you no longer need a
    > thunder god to account for it.>>
    >
    > Rational empiricists take for granted that the best thing to fill
    > your mind
    > up with is facts and good science. I'm a big fan of facts and good science
    > and it's difficult to argue this point in a room full of them
    > without coming
    > across as a nutcase or a new-age charlatan. However, most people believe
    > that facts and good science are not the be-all and end-all of a good,
    > rounded education. That means there is a purpose for filling your
    > mind with
    > something else. What could this purpose be?
    >
    > Classic literature, for one example, fills the mind with a variety of
    > narratives describing various aspects and points of view about the human
    > condition. A healthy person synthesizes and references those narratives,
    > using them to deal with everyday events and create goals and
    > aspirations for
    > the future. He or she uses them as guidelines for behavior and as a
    > reference to judge what is and is not appropriate. By making and
    > recognizing
    > literary allusions, we smile and bond with others. This all has real value
    > although it's difficult to test empirically, if for ethical considerations
    > alone.
    >
    > A good religion is part of a default set of narratives. Rational
    > empiricists
    > get hung up on the myth aspect of religions, taking it on blind
    > faith that a
    > make-believe story cannot possibly have any value. This is an irrational
    > position and a blind spot in the worldviews of many smart people.
    >
    > Also see my essay at www.memecentral.com/l3faith.htm
    >
    > Richard Brodie
    > www.memecentral.com
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 19 2002 - 00:02:57 GMT