RE: Words and memes: criteria for acceptance of new belief or meme

From: Francesca S. Alcorn (unicorn@greenepa.net)
Date: Mon Feb 18 2002 - 21:28:20 GMT

  • Next message: Keith Henson: "RE: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA07693 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 18 Feb 2002 21:33:14 GMT
    X-Sender: unicorn@pop.greenepa.net
    Message-Id: <p04320412b897224c4bb3@[192.168.2.3]>
    In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020218154715.02ca2220@pop.cogeco.ca>
    References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020217223454.02c99a30@pop.cogeco.ca> <p04320400b894842a7b89@[192.168.2.3]> <5.1.0.14.0.20020217223454.02c99a30@pop.cogeco.ca> <5.1.0.14.0.20020218154715.02ca2220@pop.cogeco.ca>
    Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 16:28:20 -0500
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    From: "Francesca S. Alcorn" <unicorn@greenepa.net>
    Subject: RE: Words and memes: criteria for acceptance of new belief or     meme
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >At 12:09 PM 18/02/02 -0500, frankie wrote:
    >
    >>Keith said:
    >>
    >>>There are papers by Zimbardo from Stanford (now president of the
    >>>American Psychological Association) that are directly on this
    >>>topic. It looks like the mechanism is more one of resistance to
    >>>social pressure than learned. I am trying to remember the name
    >>>associated with that test of resistance to social pressure where
    >>>most of the group acts a shills and one person is given the choice
    >>>of going against the group which insists the longer line on a
    >>>slide is shorter or the other way around.
    >>
    >>Millgram? It wasn't a long queue or a short queue, but numbers of
    >>dots on paper IIRC, and administering electric shocks.
    >
    >No, this was lines measured in inches. The shills, 3-4 of them were
    >instructed to pick a line which was not the longest and insist it
    >was. This was to see if the subjects would to say something under
    >social pressure that was in conflict with what their senses reported.
    >
    >It is a classic psychological experiment. A substantial fraction of
    >the population would say they something in conflict with their
    >perception. Most would admit they had given in to social pressure,
    >but (IIRC) some would insist that they had really seen the shorter
    >line as longer.
    >
    >This might be a way to sort out people who could be turned into cult members.
    >
    >Keith Henson
    >

    Yes, but it *was* Stanley Millgram who did the experiments, there are
    numerous variations.

    frankie

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 18 2002 - 21:43:11 GMT