RE: Why are human brains bigger?

From: Robin Faichney (robin@faichney.demon.co.uk)
Date: Thu May 18 2000 - 13:30:50 BST

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "RE: Technology vs. culture"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA08084 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 18 May 2000 14:07:25 +0100
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@faichney.demon.co.uk>
    Organization: Reborn Technology
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: RE: Why are human brains bigger?
    Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 13:30:50 +0100
    X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.21]
    Content-Type: text/plain
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D31CEB1AB@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Message-Id: <00051813384001.00537@faichney>
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Thu, 18 May 2000, Vincent Campbell wrote:
    >Reptiles have blind sight, in that they see movement but aren't 'aware' of
    >seeing anything- some people after accidents have the same phenomena- they
    >can see movement but can't tell you anything about what's causing the
    >movement.

    Sorry, Vincent, but that's not blind sight, which is where someone claims
    not to have seen anything, but nevertheless they act as if they did.
    Movement doesn't come into it. And it's a very difficult issue in other
    species -- or anyone we can't communicate with -- because then we only
    have their actions to go on. How do you know what a reptile's actually
    aware of??

    >Distinct groups of animals do exhibit distinct behaviours, such as birds
    >that live or near railway stations, or near major roads, seem to have their
    >'flight' responses tuned far lower than birds in the countryside when they
    >encounter people, or loud noises, or big things rushing at them very fast.
    >Does this constitute culture?

    For me, and I can't see this as controversial, that depends entirely on
    whether it's learned from conspecifics (ie imitated) or from individual
    experience. Or, I suppose, it could be genetic too, if these are distinct
    populations. Or maybe it's a combination of these! But I'd guess it's
    probably down to individual experience, so not cultural.

    --
    Robin Faichney
    

    ===============================This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 18 2000 - 14:07:50 BST