Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA07587 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 18 May 2000 12:34:50 +0100 Subject: Technology vs. culture Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 07:32:15 -0400 x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20000518113212.AAA26584@camailp.harvard.edu@[204.96.32.100]> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Vincent Campbell made this comment not too long ago --
>Also, does
>technology change in relation to culture (e.g. the design of houses
>according to Fung Shui)?
As far as I know, there has never been a manufacturing or construction
technique (aka technology) that has depended or emerged from a belief
system, i.e. feng shui. So, making feng shui a cause of technology is
erroneous, (and not just because of my one statement).
The design of buildings is culturally determined, but the design
constraints of the materials and overcoming them is technology, and so
far, AFAIK, only science has found those answers.
Putting a mirror on a door is not technology....
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 18 2000 - 12:35:17 BST