RE: Central questions of memetics

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Tue May 16 2000 - 15:08:07 BST

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: Why are human brains bigger?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA20071 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 16 May 2000 16:44:19 +0100
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D31CEB19F@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Central questions of memetics
    Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 15:08:07 +0100
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Excellent example of a purely cultural function of an object, and this then
    begs the questions I'm interested in - where did cultures come from, why do
    we have them and other animals don't, and how do cultures
    persist/develop/change?

    (By the way I'm not ant-baseball, but the Mets are playing rubbish this
    year) :-)

    Vincent

    > ----------
    > From: Wade T.Smith
    > Reply To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 1:38 am
    > To: Memetics Discussion List
    > Subject: Re: Central questions of memetics
    >
    > Chuck Palson made this comment not too long ago --
    >
    > >Except for one thing - they cannot
    > >exist for long when they are no longer useful - as the second part of the
    > >statement seems to imply.
    >
    > This is something we've been batting back and forth here- and let's take
    > a look at that bat, while we have it in our hands.
    >
    > It is an artifact, yes, and moreover, one with a specific and particular
    > purpose- to propel a thrown baseball in a game with the same name. (For
    > the benefit of our anglophiles, I will give a small nod to the bat used
    > in their peculiar variety of this game named after a loud insect.)
    >
    > But, the 'baseballbat'-ness of this artifact is tenuous, and culturally
    > situated.
    >
    > When the bat is all alone, where is baseball?
    >
    > When a game gets resurrected (or begun anew) that needs a bat to play, is
    > there a need to remember or get the old bat?
    >
    > Things come and go- the utility of a thing is part of the logic of its
    > formation, but the game it plays is memetic/cultural, and _this_ is where
    > the repetition comes in.
    >
    > But can a meme exist- can that baseballbat exist- without the game it's
    > used for?
    >
    > Good question. And I ain't sure.
    >
    > - Wade
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 16 2000 - 16:47:18 BST