Re: Central questions of memetics

From: Chuck Palson (cpalson@mediaone.net)
Date: Mon May 15 2000 - 20:59:26 BST

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: Central questions of memetics"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id BAA12952 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 16 May 2000 01:56:40 +0100
    Message-ID: <3920571E.9CD1BFD0@mediaone.net>
    Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 20:59:26 +0100
    From: Chuck Palson <cpalson@mediaone.net>
    X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; I)
    X-Accept-Language: en
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Central questions of memetics
    References: <20000516003844.AAA18234@camailp.harvard.edu@[204.96.32.182]>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    "Wade T.Smith" wrote:

    > Chuck Palson made this comment not too long ago --
    >
    > >Except for one thing - they cannot
    > >exist for long when they are no longer useful - as the second part of the
    > >statement seems to imply.
    >
    > This is something we've been batting back and forth here- and let's take
    > a look at that bat, while we have it in our hands.
    >
    > It is an artifact, yes, and moreover, one with a specific and particular
    > purpose- to propel a thrown baseball in a game with the same name. (For
    > the benefit of our anglophiles, I will give a small nod to the bat used
    > in their peculiar variety of this game named after a loud insect.)
    >
    > But, the 'baseballbat'-ness of this artifact is tenuous, and culturally
    > situated.
    >
    > When the bat is all alone, where is baseball?
    >
    > When a game gets resurrected (or begun anew) that needs a bat to play, is
    > there a need to remember or get the old bat?
    >
    > Things come and go- the utility of a thing is part of the logic of its
    > formation, but the game it plays is memetic/cultural, and _this_ is where
    > the repetition comes in.

    I lost you here. What does repetition have to do with anything? Is this some
    kind of memic concept about repetition? Please explain.

    >
    >
    > But can a meme exist- can that baseballbat exist- without the game it's
    > used for?

    Not as far as I can tell. There could exist something of the same shape and
    material as a "baseball bat" but it could not be defined as a baseball bat
    unless someone knew the game. The Brazilian indians would call it a 'pao'
    because it resembles roughly a club that they used to kill people -- unless
    they have been watching a lot of TV (which is unfortunately quite likely by
    now).

    >
    > Good question. And I ain't sure.
    >
    > - Wade
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 16 2000 - 01:57:04 BST