Re: Emergence - the concept, and evolution

From: John Wilkins (wilkins@wehi.EDU.AU)
Date: Thu May 11 2000 - 02:07:46 BST

  • Next message: Bill Spight: "Re: Emergence - the concept, and evolution"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id CAA24037 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 11 May 2000 02:09:36 +0100
    Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 11:07:46 +1000
    From: John Wilkins <wilkins@wehi.EDU.AU>
    Subject: Re: Emergence - the concept, and evolution
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    In-Reply-To: <20000511010125.AAA5923@camailp.harvard.edu@[204.96.32.218]>
    Message-ID: <MailDrop1.2d7j-PPC.1000511110746@mac463.wehi.edu.au>
    X-Authenticated: <wilkins@wehiz.wehi.edu.au>
    Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Wed, 10 May 2000 21:01:24 -0400 wade_smith@harvard.edu (Wade T.Smith)
    wrote:

    >John Wilkins made this comment not too long ago --
    >
    >>A better term is Kim's supervenience - any two identical physical
    >>systems (in all possible worlds) will have the same supervenient
    >>properties, but the same supervenient properties can be realised in
    >>different phsyical systems (identical brains have identical minds, but
    >>identical minds might also arise in computers, for example).
    >
    >Whoa.... "identical brains have identical minds" - ?!
    >
    >Interesting hypothesis.... Now, surely the situational reality of that
    >is
    >twins, and so far, there is no research that would support that twins
    >have identical minds, although there are more similarities than
    >differences.
    >
    >Identical brains somehow existing in the same places and at the same
    >times, maybe....

    Sorry, I was unclear - this is a contrary to fact claim that *if* two
    identical physical brains could be made that were the same down to, one
    presumes, the quantum level they would have the same minds. Twins are
    real world cases that do not go to this question. It's not intended as
    an empirical notion but as a definition of supervenience.
    >
    >As to minds appearing in computers, emergent or otherwise, well, knock
    >yourself out....

    Just an example, not an argument for computational theories of mind
    (which I reject, anyway).

    --
    

    John Wilkins, Head, Graphic Production The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research Melbourne, Australia <mailto:wilkins@WEHI.EDU.AU> <http://www.users.bigpond.com/thewilkins/darwiniana.html> Homo homini aut deus aut lupus - Erasmus of Rotterdam

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 11 2000 - 02:09:56 BST