RE: Central questions of memetics

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Tue May 09 2000 - 15:57:17 BST

  • Next message: daniella: "Re: a memetic experiment- an eIe opener"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA15374 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 9 May 2000 15:59:18 +0100
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D31CEB15F@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Central questions of memetics
    Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 15:57:17 +0100 
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Dear Richard,

    Given your excellent response to Chuck, I hope you didn't feel offended by
    my comment about pop-psychology and TV talk shows the other day!

    Vincent Campbell

    > ----------
    > From: Richard Brodie
    > Reply To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2000 3:27 pm
    > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Subject: RE: Central questions of memetics
    >
    > Chuck wrote:
    >
    > <<no one in this list has answered my
    > central question - what is the advantage of treating memes as having an
    > independent existence instead of being tools that people use to solve the
    > problems of existence -- tools, albeit, that *always* have unintended
    > consequences.>>
    >
    > Several people have taken a crack at communicating the essence of the idea
    > to you. Frankly, if reading my 250-page book on the subject didn't
    > enlighten
    > you I doubt anything I could say in an email would have much effect. From
    > reading your posts I have a hunch that you are emotionally invested in the
    > "intelligent design" theory of cultural evolution, that people see needs
    > and
    > create inventions to fill those needs. Those inventions then spread, or
    > don't, because of their utility. The problem is, the definition of
    > "utility"
    > needs to be bent so far to explain the prevalence of things like
    > ever-growing government bureaucracies, astrology, chain letters, and
    > fashion
    > trends that some people are unsatisfied with that explanation.
    >
    > Memetics takes the position that culture evolves the way it does because
    > some ideas---memes---possess the properties, in a given cultural context
    > and
    > with the general psychological makeup of humans, to proliferate faster and
    > wider than others. In addition there's the notion that cultural
    > organisms---memeplexes or viruses of the mind---have evolved to take
    > advantage of their environment---our minds---and spread with greater and
    > greater effectiveness.
    >
    > Why is this a more satisfying explanation than yours? Really, without
    > experimentation all I can do is plead obviousness. This is the major
    > obstacle to memetics being taken seriously: experimental results are very
    > scarce as of yet. You are right to be skeptical. That said, I think anyone
    > who actually wants to have an effect on the world would be foolish not to
    > engineer that effect through the memetic model. I called my book "Virus of
    > the Mind" and put a scary syringe on the cover, pumping ideas into a
    > brain,
    > because I wanted to push people's buttons and get them to notice the book.
    > If I believed in your "utility" model that wouldn't have mattered. I
    > jumped
    > at the chance to appear on Oprah! because I know that TV spreads memes. I
    > don't think you can argue that point. A book that Oprah likes sells more
    > copies than a "useful" book that gets no exposure.
    >
    > So don't get hung up on "independent existence." No one is claming any
    > mystical properties of memes. Looking at culture from the point of view of
    > the meme is just a trick to wrap our brains around a complex phenomenon in
    > search of a useful explanation that, in spite of its immense utility, has
    > had difficulty spreading.
    >
    > Richard Brodie richard@brodietech.com
    > http://www.memecentral.com/rbrodie.htm
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 09 2000 - 15:59:35 BST