Re: [book review- the social life of information]

From: Chuck Palson (cpalson@mediaone.net)
Date: Thu Apr 27 2000 - 19:48:20 BST

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "Introductions"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id KAA06878 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 28 Apr 2000 10:15:39 +0100
    Message-ID: <39088B74.4B847372@mediaone.net>
    Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 19:48:20 +0100
    From: Chuck Palson <cpalson@mediaone.net>
    X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; I)
    X-Accept-Language: en
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: [book review- the social life of information]
    References: <LNBBJFJFCJFOIJDOGJMAAELMEMAA.havelock@tig.com.au>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Of the two that Havelock has sent, I think this is by far the best. It
    is, however, by any usual definition of memetic, not a memetic approach
    except insofar as memologists want to consider all behavior memetic.

    The first URL, by the way, says that the memetic approach differs only a
    little from the approach of Saul Alinsky; he would walk away either
    laughing or mumbling to himself if he were alive.

    Perhaps I don't know what the memetic approach is after reading
    Blackmore's latest book and lots of postings, but it looks to me like
    what is moving it is the academic passion for studying disembodied
    things. It reminds me a lot of the fascination academics have had about
    deconstruction and textual criticism. But it's great for those who are
    always looking for the magic bullet in applying a few hard science
    analogies to human behavior.

    Understanding human behavior can be done scientifically, but not by
    borrowing a few concepts from the hard sciences and simplistically
    applying them to behavior. Also, one instantaneously looses one's ability
    to make useful discoveries when the immediate motivation seems to be to
    attack certain behaviors as morally undesirable; this seems to pervade
    memetics.

    havelock wrote:

    > another book excerpt that might be of interest...
    >
    > http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue5_4/index.html
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 28 2000 - 10:16:18 BST