Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA14667 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 25 Mar 2000 23:09:29 GMT Message-Id: <4.1.20000325150042.00cb2540@mail.rdc1.bc.wave.home.com> X-Sender: dplante@mail.rdc1.bc.wave.home.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 15:05:44 -0800 To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk From: Dan Plante <dplante@home.com> Subject: Re: Lost comments In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.4.10.10003251722240.7197045-100000@helios.physics .utoronto.ca> References: <fc.005b8ff1005f1b883b9aca00558ec8b3.5f1bcb@amazon.shu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
At 05:27 PM 25/03/00 -0500 Robert Logan wrote:
>Hi List members - someone sent me very thoughtful critique of my paper on
>March 15 or 16 and as I was trying to respond to it I some how clumsily
>lost it.
I think you might mean this one:
At 05:24 AM 01/03/00 -0500 Robert Logan wrote:
>Many thanks for your attention if you have read this far in my first
>posting. I hope to hear from those whose interest I might have piqued.
>I am rather new at the meme game but believe I have something to share
>vis-a-vis language, communications and chaos/complexity theory.
>
>Hoping to hear from some of you.
Hi, Robert. Sorry for the delay in responding, but I don't have as much
time to devote to things like this list as I'd like (being the wage-slave
Dilbert that I am :-), and I wanted to study your paper before I responded.
Well, I've finished it, and I have to say I can find nothing wrong with the
general reasoning behind your proposition regarding the specific nature of
the emergence of conceptual thought in the lineage of Homo Sapiens. As a
matter of fact, I find it to be quite insightful.
I would like to say "well done", but at the same time, I should qualify my
kudos by pointing out that I am not in your field (although electronics
engineering does have some interesting overlaps with your field regarding
feedback and control systems theory, synergetics, chaos and complexity
theory, etc.) Just a couple of quick questions, if you don't mind:
1) What is it that led you to this conclusion (ie: which connections of
which observations or seemingly unrelated knowledge made the idea "click"
or "gel" in your mind)?
2) To support your theory, have you done any work along the lines of a
formalized mathematical model to identify and characterize the order
parameters, control variables and general nature of the stable attractors
at the bifurcation of percepts --> concept/word?
The reason I'm asking is that I have come to the conclusion that the "meme"
we talk about can only be one thing: a "sentence" - or, as my grade 3
teacher kept telling me over and over again: "No, no, Daniel, "Bob and
Betty went" is a phrase, not a sentence. A sentence is a COMPLETE THOUGHT."
(No, she didn't yell at me, the emphasis is mine :-).
Actually, to be more precise, I should say that a "complete thought" (which
IS the same thing as a sentence in the English language, at least) would
HAVE to be the most fundamental element of the field we call "Memetics", if
indeed we desire Memetics to be a field which claims some explanatory
authority in the area between minds and culture. Whether we call a
"complete thought" a meme, or whether we choose to call some other higher
construct a "meme" matters little. Also, the "complete thought" MUST be a
WRITTEN one (think: Legal Code or Rules of Parlaimentary Procedure). If
it's never written down it's social, not cultural, and a merely social
construct has too many limitations to give rise to a persistent cultural
entity: memory space and abstraction (ie. "thinking") space are too small,
mutability is too large, persistence in one form - ie: one person's
lifetime - is too short to provide the persistent memory store akin to
"genes", etc.
Anyway, the emergence dynamics that lead from sensations of qualia, then to
percepts, and then to concepts and finally to "complete thoughts" is key to
determining whether this view can be supported. If you've developed, or
know of, any formalized models in this area, I'd like to know about it. The
rest of the path from complete thoughts, to stories, to society, to
culture, to technology are, I think, much easier to formalize within this
framework.
Dan
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 25 2000 - 23:09:42 GMT