RE: objections to "memes"

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Thu Mar 23 2000 - 13:54:31 GMT

  • Next message: Gatherer, D. (Derek): "RE: objections to "memes"" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA08606 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 23 Mar 2000 13:56:36 GMT
Subject: RE: objections to "memes"
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 08:54:31 -0500
x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas est veritas
From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: "memetics list" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-ID: <20000323135432.AAA3721@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    On 03/23/00 08:35, Gatherer, D. (Derek) said this-

    >It's
    >a population-level rather than an individual-level approach.

    But because mutation is part of its subset, a population-level approach
    is fruitless.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 23 2000 - 13:56:54 GMT