Re: J.Z. Young on mnemons

From: Aaron Lynch (aaron@mcs.net)
Date: Sat Mar 04 2000 - 18:03:58 GMT

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "Re: J.Z. Young on mnemons"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA10164 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 4 Mar 2000 18:06:07 GMT
    Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.20000304120358.011e2d44@popmail.mcs.net>
    X-Sender: aaron@popmail.mcs.net
    X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.1 (32)
    Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2000 12:03:58 -0600
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    From: Aaron Lynch <aaron@mcs.net>
    Subject: Re: J.Z. Young on mnemons
    In-Reply-To: <JLICPGAKDIINCCAA@my-deja.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    At 08:40 AM 3/4/00 -0800, Scott Chase wrote:
    >This is an apt quote from J.Z. Young:
    >
    >(bq) "Incidentally many modern ideas on the subject go back to Richard
    Semon (1904) who wrote much of the mneme or mnemic faculty and invented the
    word engram. I do not think however that anyone has used mnemon or a
    similar word in quite the same sense of the module now to be proposed" (eq)
    >
    >ref:
    >
    >Young JZ. 1965. The organization of a memory system. Proceedings of the
    Royal Society of London (163): 285*-320
    >
    >I may have goofed the initial page number on my previous post.
    >
    >Scott
    >

    Thank you, Scott.

    I have actually seen this article, although not until after inventing a new
    definition for "mnemon" and publishing it in 1991. I do not, however, the
    term in the same sense as the module Young (1965) proposes. Young's meaning
    also differs from my own in that he does not define "mnemon" as something
    that can be "the same" from one organism to another. Young's "mnemon" is
    thus not, in my view, a memetics-related term: without "sameness" from
    individual to individual, there can be no "replication," and Young does not
    discuss "replication." Also, Young's usage seems does not seem to be in
    current usage by memory researchers as far as I can tell. I would, however,
    be interested in hearing from anyone who finds a memory research paper or
    other science paper from the past 25 years that uses the word. I intend to
    make a more comprehensive footnote about the word in future works. Notice
    that Young also expresses some uncertainty about whether anyone else has
    used "mnemon" before he did. That is not surprising, since the word itself
    is easily coined. Nevertheless, I would also appreciate hearing from anyone
    who knows of a usage pre-dating Young's.

    I also have found one dictionary that lists "Mnemon" with a Greek mythology
    definition, although this may be a typographical mutation of "Memnon."

    --Aaron Lynch

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 04 2000 - 18:06:13 GMT