Re: What are memes made of?

From: Joe E. Dees (joedees@bellsouth.net)
Date: Mon Feb 28 2000 - 17:27:32 GMT

  • Next message: Joe E. Dees: "Re: What are memes made of?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id RAA07447 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 28 Feb 2000 17:25:02 GMT
    Message-Id: <200002281724.MAA03352@mail3.lig.bellsouth.net>
    From: "Joe E. Dees" <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:27:32 -0600
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: What are memes made of?
    In-reply-to: <00022616280401.00384@faichney>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12b)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    From: Robin Faichney <robin@faichney.demon.co.uk>
    Organization: Reborn Technology
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: What are memes made of?
    Date sent: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 16:24:46 +0000
    Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    > On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, Joe E. Dees wrote:
    > >The neat distinction is that the imprinted slight song variations are
    > >communicating nothing that the absence of such variation would
    > >not communicate, and the birds cannot get together and agree or
    > >disagree on either a significance or a change in significance for the
    > >variations; the choice of narrow vs. wide ties communicates and
    > >means different things (the value of being in vs. out of style) as long
    > >as we agree to let it do so.
    >
    > I still don't understand why memes should have meaning -- the significance of
    > significance, if you like, for memetics. I'm really not questioning meaning in
    > general terms -- how could we do without it??? But what, precisely, is the
    > place of meaning _in memetics_?
    >
    Meaning is the content of the communication. Form bereft of
    content can have no independent existence in a communication
    any more than content can have independent of form, just as there
    can be neither semantics purified of syntax nor syntactics purifies
    of semantics. There must be (1) coding and (2) the encoded for
    any transmission/reception to occur; SOMETHING must be
    communicated - an empty communication is a contradiction in
    terms, so without it, there is nothing to be memetically multiplied
    through dissemination. Meaning is also what undergoes mutation
    and evolution in the individual mind.
    > --
    > Robin Faichney
    >
    >
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 28 2000 - 17:25:07 GMT