Re: memetics-digest V1 #119

From: Robin Faichney (robin@faichney.demon.co.uk)
Date: Wed Feb 02 2000 - 05:35:23 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "More on what memes are made of"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id GAA02563 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 2 Feb 2000 06:31:11 GMT
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@faichney.demon.co.uk>
    Organization: Reborn Technology
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: memetics-digest V1 #119
    Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 05:35:23 +0000
    X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.21]
    Content-Type: text/plain
    References: <200002020256.VAA22907@mail5.lig.bellsouth.net>
    Message-Id: <00020205451700.00437@faichney>
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Wed, 02 Feb 2000, Joe E. Dees wrote:
    >> On Tue, 01 Feb 2000, VANWYHE@aol.com wrote:
    >>
    >> >I think it is a waste of time to endlessly debate genes vs memes. I don't
    >> >give a toss about memes- the idea strikes me as totally presumptuous.
    >>
    >> How much reading on it have you done?
    >>
    >This strikes me as a strange question, Robin, especially coming
    >from you. Your problem is reductionism; you are trying to reduce
    >semantics (the relations between the sign and the signified - the
    >things), pragmatics (the relations between the sign and the signifier
    >- us), and syntactics (the relations between signs in a sign
    >system), the three divisions of semiotics (the realm of meaning) to
    >physics and chemistry (the realm of being), and when you atomize
    >things, you lose the emergent qualities which arise form complex
    >and dynamic interrelation.

    I clearly differentiate between physical and intentional information, and have
    said almost nothing about the latter. How you think you know my views
    in that area puzzles me greatly. Regarding reductionism in general, I have
    always been strongly anti. You should address what I say, not what you think
    I'd say.

    --
    Robin Faichney
    

    ===============================This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 02 2000 - 06:31:12 GMT