RE: Internal meme?

John C. 'Buck' Field (
Mon, 4 Oct 1999 13:24:55 -0500

From: "John C. 'Buck' Field" <>
To: <>
Subject: RE: Internal meme?
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 13:24:55 -0500
In-Reply-To: <99100418352506.00322@faichney>

>>Yes it has. Is there any portion of this great length that you feel is
>relevant, and
>>if so, where is it and why does it relate?
>I'm afraid I don't like your tone.

This herring brings up a valid point: Perhaps more diplomatic phrasing would
encourage more productive dialogue. As I said before: my priority is knowledge,
therefore sometimes concern for popularity is eclipsed by a passion for learning. I
will try to give this failing more attention, and I apologize for treating you without
the sensitivity that anyone deserves.

>But I'm sure you're perfectly capable of
>finding your own way.

Your certainty may not be well founded ;^), but I would appreciate at least a clue
regarding what I should be looking for...

Would you Pretty-Please-With-Sugar-On-Top explain your criticism of my meme

A ship in the harbor is safe, but that's not
what ships are for. Carpe Diem!
Field Operative Services:
Database and Web Solutions

This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)