RE: Internal meme?

Robin Faichney (
Mon, 4 Oct 1999 18:33:51 +0100

From: Robin Faichney <>
Subject: RE: Internal meme?
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 18:33:51 +0100
Message-Id: <99100418352506.00322@faichney>

On Mon, 04 Oct 1999, John C. 'Buck' Field wrote:
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: []On Behalf
>>Of Robin Faichney
>>Not many people around here would refer to the meme that way.
>Popularity is not the goal of my definition. Expanding my understanding=
>>It is a very
>>loose usage which can work in some contexts, but not where memetics its=
elf is
>>the main topic of interest.
>Do you have an example where this definitions fails within a context of =
interest in
>>This has been discussed at great length quite recently. You should che=
ck the
>Yes it has. Is there any portion of this great length that you feel is =
relevant, and
>if so, where is it and why does it relate?

I'm afraid I don't like your tone. But I'm sure you're perfectly capable=
finding your own way.

Robin Faichney
The Prime Source of MetaInformation --

=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: