Re: The information theoretic view Was: JOM

t (
Sun, 5 Sep 1999 03:34:36 EDT

From: <>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 1999 03:34:36 EDT
Subject: Re: The information theoretic view Was: JOM

In a message dated 9/5/1999 5:56:12 AM !!!First Boot!!!, writes:

>>If Richard is really being obstructionist, it
>would be wiser to either discuss it privately with him or not at all.

You're right, Jake, I need to think a little more before hitting that
Send button. Look out for evidence that I'm doing so. <<

BTW, just for the record, I really don't think Richard is being an
obstructionist - though I allow that I could be wrong about that. I think he
is just expressing reservations that anybody considering empirical processes
for a working science of memetics would address. I personally share his
skepticisms, though I am the first delighted to see people trying to devolope
rigorous models. We have to start with something if we hope to eventually
end up with something that actually works.

Though I obviously don't think that information alone can provide a complete
account of memetics, I do not see any reason in principle why it cannot
provide at least a partial and useful account. Many well respected and
established sciences never achieve anything greater than that (physics so far
for starters).


This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)