Re: Halfway through Blackmore

t (MemeLab@aol.com)
Mon, 19 Apr 1999 14:20:35 EDT

From: <MemeLab@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 14:20:35 EDT
Subject: Re: Halfway through Blackmore
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

In a message dated 4/19/99 12:59:00 PM Central Daylight Time,
robin@faichney.demon.co.uk writes:

<< Thanks for keeping us updated on your reactions, Jake. Make sure you do
a substantial piece, reiterating all the main themes, when you finish
the book. I'm sure we'll all make time to read it.
--
Robin Faichney >>

Of course. As you can see though, I am impatient and off the cuff true to my
gadfly ways. If I am gonna be the philosophical irritant I hope to be, I
gotta shoot quickly - besides I think she indicated her closure on the
pheMotype/memotype issue by concluding that we should refer to Campbell's
rule and indicating that was more or less her conclusion - and I think that
was a wee mistake. If I prove wrong on that, I will be delighted to
graciously and publicaly revise my opinion on that - its a luxury that we
no-names have a lot of. And yes there WILL be a reiteration upon my
conclusion. I can imagine that you can barely wait. According to Mr. Lees,
everybody is just waiting to hear Jake's latest insight. I can't let my
public down! ;-)

-Jake

===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit