Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 12:17:16 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Memetics IS a cult
Just to be deliberately naive....
Why can't memetics become a science AND a religion? After all, applied
science that works really feels and looks like magic to people.... And who
says a religion can't be scientific?-- the priesthood of science, headed
by people like Dawkins and other eliminatists?
I would like to see the "folk" become empowered with a more exact science
of society. People engineering ideologies left and right, people becoming
immune to the media far too quickly... Our dear establishment would have
to flinch a bit.
I have a nagging suspicion (which I might explore further) that such a
PDP/ kind of hyper-grassroots implementation of meme-science would be more
acceptable for society, and far more healthy than a top-down euthenics
approach to it, which of course we would have to do silently anyway if we
were choose that turn.
> Paul Blaising wrote:
> >This Word came first, and Richard showed how to apply it to memetics
> >Memetics IS a cult. The Church of Virus is its church, Virus of the Mind
> >Bible, and Richard Brodie its Prophet!
> I do not agree. I suspect you've taken several things more seriously than
> they have been intended by their creators. You've bought into the medium,
> but ignored the message.
> (But I guess that's how most religions begin, regrettably.)
> - -Tim Rhodes
> End of memetics-digest V1 #152
> This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
> Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
> For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
> see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
-Robert P. Levy-
A random quote...
"It is a secret both in nature and state, that it is safer to change many
things than one."
-- Francis Bacon
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)