# Re: Meme Extinction

Joseph Bloch (ulfgrim@nac.net)
Wed, 28 May 1997 09:42:02 -0400

```From: Joseph Bloch <ulfgrim@nac.net>
To: memetics <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Meme Extinction
Date: Wed, 28 May 1997 09:42:02 -0400
Message-Id: <13440213912662@nac.net>
```

Peter Bentley wrote (and I snipped for bandwidth):

> Perhaps we should define what 'Bloch's paradox' actually *is*. I thought
> he was saying that you cannot study an extinct meme without
'resurrecting' it.
> Now, I repeat what I said previously - you cannot study an extinct meme
*at all*
> if it is truly extinct - because it is lost forever. Hence, there is a
> but a slightly different one.
>
>
> if you can "observe directly" a meme THEN IT IS NOT EXTINCT!

That's it exactly. My point was that the very act of studying a meme means
that it cannot be extinct, because by studying it we give it a host mind,
and thus the meme lives.

Joseph Bloch (new email address)
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit