Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA24296 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Fri, 15 Feb 2002 13:07:50 GMT Subject: give it to them, too Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 08:02:36 -0500 x-sender: email@example.com x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <email@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-Id: <20020215130219.F40C21FD51@camail.harvard.edu> Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
Hi Vincent Campbell -
>Habermas' ideas would seem a useful framework as it places the
>dissemination of information, or rather the question of who has
>control/influence over information dissemination, at the core of the problem
>of contemporary society.
IMHO 'contemporary' has little to do with it. What is now, has been, but,
perhaps, (ever the optimist) need not evermore shall be.
We always mark enlightenment within societies by the amount of and the
access to libraries.
And mark despotism by the destruction and lack of same.
The more people who know more, the better, and I believe there are many
business models that support this. It's called open-book management, I
Would Enron have happened in an enlightened socio-economy?
Only abortion gives you the right to remain silent.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 13:17:21 GMT