Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA14959 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Tue, 12 Feb 2002 15:34:25 GMT X-Originating-IP: [18.104.22.168] From: "Grant Callaghan" <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: RE: ply to Grant Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 07:28:36 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: <LAW2-F128v3zOdnjQ8v000002bb@hotmail.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Feb 2002 15:28:36.0881 (UTC) FILETIME=[F0975810:01C1B3D9] Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> > >
> > > > > <If you feel that is agrandizing someone, we see it differently.>
> > > > >
> > > > > Who's the "we" here?
> > > > >
> > > > > Vincent
> > > >
> > > <I thought in that instance it was you and me.>
> > >
> > > Then who's the 'you'? :-)
> > >
> > > Vincent
> <What kind of ID do you want?>
> I just don't see how I could feel that your comments were
>aggrandizing someone and see if differently at the same time...
Vincent, correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think the quote in line one
above is mine. But even if it was, what difference does a single word make
in a long conversation? No one here is writing these snippets for
publication -- I don't think. A lot of what is written is carelessly tossed
around on the spur of the moment. Your objection to the use of "we" that
may include you is duely noted and will be avoided by me in the future.
Does that solve the problem for you? I can't even remember what we were
talking about when the incident occurred and it doesn't seem worth the
effort of tracing it back to its beginnings.
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 12 2002 - 15:52:35 GMT