Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id IAA13598 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Tue, 12 Feb 2002 08:48:05 GMT Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 00:42:25 -0800 Message-Id: <200202120842.g1C8gP6a027341@mail25.bigmailbox.com> X-Authentication-Warning: mail25.bigmailbox.com: www set sender to firstname.lastname@example.org using -f Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary X-Mailer: MIME-tools 4.104 (Entity 4.116) X-Originating-Ip: [220.127.116.11] From: "Joe Dees" <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: RE: Re: Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)
> Vincent Campbell <email@example.com> "'firstname.lastname@example.org'" <email@example.com> RE: Re:Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 15:40:32 -0000
><Do hindus, Monotheists and animists? atheism falls under the definiotion of
>religion as it cannot to my mind be irrefutably proven, and therefore
>requires an element of belief.>
>Nothing can be irrefutably proven. All knowledge is contingent,
>but_all_religions claim to have, divinely revealed, absolute knowledge. All
>atheism is, therefore, is the rejection of religions' claims to absolute
>knowledge. After all the fact tht some religions have one god, some many,
>some no 'gods' at all, is actually irrelevant, what matters is that they
>make claims of absolute knowledge and require followers to believe based on
>faith not evidence.
>Speaking personally, the balance of evidence against any particular religion
>being true is massively weighted against. Taking Christianity for instance,
>you have contradictory doctrines, historically problematic content of
>religious texts, implausible (or explainable) 'miracles' in the core texts
>(and lots of faked ones subsequently), evidence of contradictions of
>practice by believers, evidence of wider behaviour apparently entirely
>contradictory to supposed following of the faith etc. etc.
>To quote myself (from this list many times before) rain dances don't make it
According to Karl Popper, an absolute universal empirical assertion may not be proven to be true, only corroborated by massive evidence, as we cannot look under every rock in the universe, nor can we foreclose the possibility of contrafactual evidence arising in the future; however, absolute universal empirical assertions CAN be proven to be false, either through showing that they are internally logically self-contradictory or by producing an empirical counterexample.
>The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by
>charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA. Privileged/Confidential Information may
>be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated
>in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such
>person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone
>and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
>prohibited and may be unlawful. In such case, you should destroy this
>message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise
>immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email
>for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other
>information in this message that do not relate to the official
>business of the University of Stirling shall be understood as neither
>given nor endorsed by it.
>This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
>Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
>For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
Looking for a book? Want a deal? No problem AddALL!
http://www.addall.com compares book price at 41 online stores.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 12 2002 - 09:16:13 GMT