Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA06313 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Sun, 10 Feb 2002 16:58:17 GMT Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 11:52:56 -0500 Subject: Re: The Urge to Punish Cheats: Not Just Human, but Selfless Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: "Wade T.Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Message-Id: <A1ED44FA-1E46-11D6-A54A-003065B9A95A@harvard.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.480) Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
On Sunday, February 10, 2002, at 11:10 , Ray Recchia wrote:
> So what will you offer?
It didn't even enter my head reading about that experiment to offer
anything but a clean split down the middle, and I can't see any reason
why an offer of anything but 50% makes any sense at all. The main logic
is getting the money at all, and, any tincture of unfairness might jinx
Anyway, were I a participant in that experiment, I would offer 50%, and
refuse anything else.
After all, it is money falling from the trees in the first place....
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 10 2002 - 17:07:44 GMT