Re: ality

Date: Sun Feb 10 2002 - 15:35:56 GMT

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "noogenetics vs. memetics"

    Received: by id PAA05939 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Sun, 10 Feb 2002 15:43:24 GMT
    From: <>
    Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 16:35:56 +0100
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: ality
    Message-ID: <3C66A16C.22336.E3705A@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <007101c1ae8e$32be35c0$7624f4d8@teddace>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Precedence: bulk

    On 5 Feb 2002, at 13:43, Dace wrote:

    > The mind simply relies on different neurons to facilitate the
    > recollection. If memories are indeed encoded in the brain, then once the
    > relevant neural tissue is destroyed, they're not going to suddenly pop up in
    > a different set of neurons.

    It's possible because the brain might 'double-save' memory. So
    there are two different places where the same gets stored and if in
    one place something gets lost it can be rebuilt from the other

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 10 2002 - 16:08:45 GMT