Re: Words and memes

From: Keith Henson (
Date: Sat Feb 09 2002 - 18:54:19 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: Meta-memes?"

    Received: by id SAA03433 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Sat, 9 Feb 2002 18:57:42 GMT
    Message-Id: <>
    X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
    Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2002 13:54:19 -0500
    From: Keith Henson <>
    Subject: Re: Words and memes
    In-Reply-To: <001f01c1b192$d8bd22e0$5e2ffea9@oemcomputer>
    References: <002001c1aff4$20a2b660$3e03aace@oemcomputer> <> <> <>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
    Precedence: bulk

    At 08:54 AM 09/02/02 -0900, "Philip Jonkers" <>
    > > The whole article is 30k and I my thinking has moved on from some of the
    > > things I said in that article. Still, if there is no objection I may post
    > > it in 3-4 pieces.
    >No objection from my side. But perhaps you can modify it a little so that is
    >more compatible with your current views.

    I don't like to mess with something that old, but I could interline
    comments where my thinking has evolved.


    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 09 2002 - 19:24:44 GMT