RE: Meta-memes?

From: Lawrence DeBivort (
Date: Sat Feb 09 2002 - 16:50:56 GMT

  • Next message: Lawrence DeBivort: "RE: Words and memes: criteria for acceptance of new belief or meme"

    Received: by id RAA03142 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Sat, 9 Feb 2002 17:21:53 GMT
    From: "Lawrence DeBivort" <>
    To: <>
    Subject: RE: Meta-memes?
    Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 11:50:56 -0500
    Message-ID: <>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
    Importance: Normal
    In-Reply-To: <001c01c1b192$32b133a0$5e2ffea9@oemcomputer>
    Precedence: bulk

    At the Memetics Group, we use the term 'meta-meme' to refer to those memes
    that address issues of memetics, learning, knowledge, authority. That is, a
    meta-meme is a meme about memes and their nature.

    Does this make sense? It is always easier to explain this with a diagram. It
    consists of a circle, with the word 'memes' written in it, and then a much
    smaller circle off to the side, with a arrow pointing to the big circle and
    the word 'meta-meme' in it.


    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: []On Behalf
    > Of Philip Jonkers
    > Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 12:50 PM
    > To:
    > Subject: Meta-memes?
    > Keith, or anyone else who can answer this question:
    > What exactly are meta-memes?

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 09 2002 - 17:39:40 GMT