Re: Words and memes

From: Philip Jonkers (
Date: Sat Feb 09 2002 - 17:54:38 GMT

  • Next message: Philip Jonkers: "Re: Words and memes"

    Received: by id RAA02998 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Sat, 9 Feb 2002 17:03:09 GMT
    Message-ID: <001f01c1b192$d8bd22e0$5e2ffea9@oemcomputer>
    From: "Philip Jonkers" <>
    To: <>
    References: <002001c1aff4$20a2b660$3e03aace@oemcomputer><><> <>
    Subject: Re: Words and memes
    Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 08:54:38 -0900
    Organization: Prodigy Internet
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
    X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
    Precedence: bulk

    > The whole article is 30k and I my thinking has moved on from some of the
    > things I said in that article. Still, if there is no objection I may post
    > it in 3-4 pieces.

    No objection from my side. But perhaps you can modify it a little so that is
    more compatible with your current views.


    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 09 2002 - 17:20:00 GMT