Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA02762 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Sat, 9 Feb 2002 16:14:25 GMT Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 11:08:51 -0500 Subject: Re: Words and memes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: "Wade T.Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <NEBBKOADILIOKGDJLPMAKEMPCKAA.firstname.lastname@example.org> Message-Id: <4EC28B6F-1D77-11D6-83E5-003065B9A95A@harvard.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.480) Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
On Saturday, February 9, 2002, at 08:44 , Lawrence DeBivort wrote:
> Memes cannot destroy or bypass this judgement-making mechanism: to be
> adopted they must meet its criteria for adoption.
> This helps explain why
> some memes are taken up by some people and not by others: our
> heirarchies of
> values differ person to person, as do the levels of certainty that we
> require within our judgment-making processes.
We are developmentally locked into opening up holes for cultural
instantiations to fill.
It is (I think) the place of memetics to show how the holes are fillable
within the cultural sphere. This overlaps with developmental linguistics
and of course with cognitive neuroscience. Who holds the umbrella is up
for grabs, I suppose. Personally, I'd like memetics to hold it, but,
getting the fingers of neuroscience unwrapped from the handle might be
impossible, not to mention the greed on the part of psychology.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 09 2002 - 16:36:09 GMT