Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA29935 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Fri, 8 Feb 2002 15:54:30 GMT Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 10:48:28 -0500 Subject: Re: Words and memes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Wade Smith <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <email@example.com> Message-Id: <4BB29F34-1CAB-11D6-9398-003065A0F24C@harvard.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.480) Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
On Friday, February 8, 2002, at 10:12 ,
> I don't have a problem with people voicing their political or religious
> views. I do have a problem with using memetics to justify them.
Is memetics a valid justification for anything?
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 08 2002 - 16:10:08 GMT