Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA24878 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Thu, 7 Feb 2002 12:31:27 GMT Subject: Re: Abstractism Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 07:26:04 -0500 x-sender: email@example.com x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <email@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-Id: <20020207122551.A54431FD47@camail.harvard.edu> Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
Hi Joe Dees -
>>And, they can be misunderstood, too.
>Perfect communication is an impossibly absolutist abstraction that
>requires perfectly attuned communicators using a perfect communicational
Well, of course. And we ain't privy to such. Imperfection is not only
rampant, but should never be discounted as part of the memetic process.
We do memes to be understood, but, we aren't understood.
We do more memes.
And, there is a level of cultural understanding that is quite different
from the meme we performed, even if we did all the motions and said all
One can pay lip service to cultural understandings.
Lots of cultural behaviors are not memes, but sham recitations.
And some, too, are mistakes.
All in the mix.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 12:40:32 GMT