Re: Memetic as an Adjective

From: Wade T.Smith (
Date: Wed Feb 06 2002 - 23:15:38 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: ply to Grant"

    Received: by id XAA22787 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 23:21:10 GMT
    Subject: Re: Memetic as an Adjective
    Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 18:15:38 -0500
    x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <>
    To: "Memetics Discussion List" <>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Message-Id: <>
    Precedence: bulk

    Hi Joe Dees -

    >why not use the term 'memetic' as an adjective, to indicate the quality of
    >replicability of an idea, a behavior, a message or an artifact?

    >There are probably as many problems as there are solutions with this
    >approach; I merely toss it out there to be mulled over for strengths and

    It's an approach I've actually been using regularly recently. (Does that
    mean I like it, or that it's merely useful, or, well, sort of fits with
    the behavior-only stance, or, well redux, is a bit of a laze about...?
    Only time may tell.)

    - Wade

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 06 2002 - 23:35:03 GMT