Re: Apoptosis

From: Keith Henson (
Date: Tue Feb 05 2002 - 22:11:14 GMT

  • Next message: Steve Drew: "(no subject)"

    Received: by id WAA17565 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 22:15:22 GMT
    Message-Id: <>
    X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
    Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2002 17:11:14 -0500
    From: Keith Henson <>
    Subject: Re: Apoptosis
    In-Reply-To: <002d01c1ae85$57e392e0$e1aabed4@default>
    References: <>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
    Precedence: bulk

    At 09:39 PM 05/02/02 +0100, "Kenneth Van Oost"


    >I will try to eleborate,
    >If memes were to be multiplicated ( replicated in numbers) do other memes
    >die !? Allegedly, not ! They stay all the time somewhere, they can be/ will
    >be forgotten, there will be no longer a behavior/ trait/ habit attached to
    >them_ they won 't die in the sense we all think about. They will not evolve
    >further either.

    Of course a meme or a gene can "die," that is the information that made the
    meme is no longer in existence.

    Any totally forgotten meme that left no traces on papers or in artifacts is
    gone this way.

    Keith Henson

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 05 2002 - 22:41:00 GMT