Re: Words and memes

From: Wade T.Smith (
Date: Tue Feb 05 2002 - 04:06:44 GMT

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "Re: The Tipping Point, perspective"

    Received: by id EAA15714 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 04:12:15 GMT
    Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 23:06:44 -0500
    Subject: Re: Words and memes
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <>
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    In-Reply-To: <>
    Message-Id: <>
    X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.480)
    Precedence: bulk

    On Monday, February 4, 2002, at 09:43 , Joe Dees wrote:

    > Nature does not intentionally mutate genes with an 'eye' toward the
    > future

    Certainly true. I more meant, it's not 'blind' as regards motion and
    direction. It's not intentional, but it has the unblindedness of

    > people do frequently intentionally mutate memes in order to improve
    > their replicatory coefficient.

    I wonder if such mutation is not _completely_ due to the intention of
    improving their replicatory coefficient- understand my meme totally, and
    you are me.

    - Wade

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 05 2002 - 05:17:11 GMT