Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA14173 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Mon, 4 Feb 2002 18:03:57 GMT Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 12:57:50 -0500 Subject: Re: Islam's Captive Women Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Wade Smith <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3102A6D21A@inchna.stir.ac.uk> Message-Id: <B498CDC3-1998-11D6-A025-003065A0F24C@harvard.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.480) Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
On Monday, February 4, 2002, at 11:32 , Vincent Campbell wrote:
> Name me a religion that doesn't oppress women (or men for that matter).
Most any Wiccan coven does not. Satanism does not, either, in
its most organized form.... The Shakers didn't.
Of course, generally, all of the established, state-linked religions do.
And, what with the recent uncoverings about the catholic church,
in several countries, the oppression of children, beyond the
oppression of their free-thought, has been not only officially
ignored, but, officially sanctioned.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 04 2002 - 18:12:37 GMT