Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id WAA12383 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Sun, 3 Feb 2002 22:27:11 GMT Message-Id: <firstname.lastname@example.org> X-Sender: email@example.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 17:23:34 -0500 To: firstname.lastname@example.org From: Keith Henson <email@example.com> Subject: Re: Words and memes In-Reply-To: <004401c1ace3$0c6cdfe0$5cc1b3d1@teddace> References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
At 10:46 AM 03/02/02 -0800, "Dace" <email@example.com>
>The key issue is whether the unit of culture is self-replicated or
>intentionally replicated by a conscious agent. Memes are active. Ideas are
Again I think this is a catchy way to express the essence of the "meme
Idea is very close in "meaning space" to meme, but meme has the replication
So you could have Watt's *idea* about how to improve steam engines
"separate condenser" which you would use to describe Watt's study and
coming up with the idea. You would use the *meme* of "separate condenser"
when you wanted to talk about Watt's idea spreading like wildfire among the
steam engineers of the day.
I have often written that an idea fails to be a meme (at best it is a
potential meme) when someone has an idea and never communicates the
idea. By this line of thinking an idea written on paper is still not a
meme until someone (other than the writer) read it. Shades of the spooky
observer effects in quantum mechanics!
Of course, none of this negates the essence of any particular meme being
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 03 2002 - 22:35:51 GMT