Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA04910 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Thu, 31 Jan 2002 13:23:44 GMT Subject: re: necessity of mental memes Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 08:18:08 -0500 x-sender: firstname.lastname@example.org x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <email@example.com> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-Id: <20020131131759.7974B1FD48@camail.harvard.edu> Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
Hi email@example.com -
>"Dr Tony Baloney".
I'm the one who questioned the identity of what I thought was an obvious
joke, and from all evidence now received (that is, no follow up), it is a
And I'm sorry, but, when I see something like 'Tony Baloney'- that's
precisely what I think it is- baloney.
In this case, I appear to be right, but, I'll certainly declare my
questioning the validity of a name like that is not only correct, but
just and ethical.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 13:46:21 GMT