Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id WAA01078 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Tue, 29 Jan 2002 22:26:41 GMT X-Originating-IP: [22.214.171.124] From: "Steve Drew" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Subject: Civilisations as a System of Memeplexes Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 22:20:55 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: <F216etpIuPHDXE2sCRB00009f29@hotmail.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jan 2002 22:20:55.0344 (UTC) FILETIME=[3814BB00:01C1A913] Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
<Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 08:21:39 +0000 (GMT)
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?John=20Croft?= <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Civilisations as a System of Memeplexes>
See above if you want it in full
I’m fairly new here myself, so welcome.
I’ve been giving this a bit of thought, so here they are. I hope you find
them of some use.
Some of the five scenarios that you mention do seem to be occuring, however
i am not as convinced (yet) that we are in the death throes of our
civilisation due to a number of factors that were not present when past
The most obvious of these in technology. I agree that as a civilisation
exceeds its ecological resource it should fall, and is still a possibility
for ours. Unlike in the past we have the ability to manufacture ecologies in
a literal sense eg the Eden project in the UK. Given sufficient energy it
would be possible to grow food and such things as pharmaceuticals alomst
anywhere. The key of course is the sufficient energy - this needs to be
cheap. We are just at present beginning to explore renewables, so this is an
Secondly, we should expand our niche. At present we are vunerable and the
only way is up! Again we are only at the begining of this (though IMO, we
are way behind where we could be if governments and buisness got thier act
together). Should some of the technology pay off (eg crystalline compounds,
medciene etc), it would lead to a drive to establish more orbital
facilities. Denis Tito has already shown there is a market for people who
want to experience space as a holiday. From there there is only onwards.
[ok, so i have some optimism, i’ve been ‘infected’ with the space meme,
since 1969 : ) ].
I do agree that the next few decades are going to be turbulent but like Rome
we will only know our civilisation has fallen after the fact. IMO by the
time we notice it will be too late to do anything, so if we’ve noticed
something wrong it may not be too late.
<Today, outside the "core" areas of the Corporate Industrial civilisation to
which we belong, life in the future is beginning to look very grim.>
Just been reading Naomi Klein’s “No Logo” (which i've interpreted as that
some corporations have got the practicalities of memetic marketing, if not
the theory), and that struck a chord, and brought back some memories which
may be relevant. As far as i can tell, if you listen to some of the eco
groups there are sufficient resources available, its the distribution and
waste that is the major problem (and the lack of veggies - animals cost more
in land per person than non-meat crops).
Although i don’t want to get into ‘what is civilisation?’, if you regard the
world as civilisation, then technically we should be ok for a while anyway.
If you mean the Western hemisphere, first world, etc, then what i put
earlier is my view. There are still many avenues to be explored.
Finally, i do regard civilisation, society etc, as, in part, the interaction
of memes or memeplexes if you prefer. I say part because there are also
genetic components that also govern our interactions.
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 29 2002 - 22:35:09 GMT