Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA05364 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Mon, 28 Jan 2002 23:55:17 GMT From: <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 00:49:26 +0100 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: Meme bonding Message-ID: <3C55F196.6352.405F3E@localhost> References: <012901c1a83e$dc2a8f60$5e2ffea9@oemcomputer> In-reply-to: <803412F9-142E-11D6-A2D9-003065A0F24C@harvard.edu> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
On 28 Jan 2002, at 15:35, Wade Smith wrote:
> Termites make mounds.
Indeed, and termites have genes too. So the cultural outcome is a
result of genes.
Mounds select certain termites and termites build mounds. See
> And that's pretty genetic. Unless you want to call it memetic,
It's not memetic because the termites don't copy the design of a
mound from other cultures (as far as i know).
> > Philip:
> > it is the
> > current gene-pool which build brains that restrict meme-creativity
> > potential.
> And this is an interesting comment. What leads you to think we
> are being restricted in our meme-creativity? What potential
> memes do you see that have their actualities missing?
It's actually that what you can't think of. To name anything would
fall into the "meme-creativity potential" category.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 29 2002 - 00:03:51 GMT