Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA04960 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Mon, 28 Jan 2002 20:39:35 GMT Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 15:35:00 -0500 Subject: Re: Meme bonding Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Wade Smith <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <012901c1a83e$dc2a8f60$5e2ffea9@oemcomputer> Message-Id: <803412F9-142E-11D6-A2D9-003065A0F24C@harvard.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.480) Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
On Monday, January 28, 2002, at 04:00 , Philip Jonkers wrote:
> the brain makes memes.
So you say....
Termites make mounds.
And that's pretty genetic. Unless you want to call it memetic,
and, you're not alone in that, from what I've seen, what with
the bird song claims.
> it is the
> current gene-pool which build brains that restrict meme-creativity
And this is an interesting comment. What leads you to think we
are being restricted in our meme-creativity? What potential
memes do you see that have their actualities missing?
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 28 2002 - 21:00:25 GMT