Re: sex and the single meme

Date: Mon Jan 28 2002 - 16:45:07 GMT

  • Next message: "Re: sex and the single meme"

    Received: by id QAA04452 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 16:51:10 GMT
    From: <>
    Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 17:45:07 +0100
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: sex and the single meme
    Message-ID: <3C558E23.4710.F2CA14@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <000901c1a80c$dcd97fc0$10a2bed4@default>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Precedence: bulk

    On 28 Jan 2002, at 16:02, Kenneth Van Oost wrote:

    > All what can go wrong is not seen as purely abstractions but as real,
    > living enteties with which we must fight.
    > Everything what goes your way, you must cherish, be nice to, protect,
    > care for, love.

    Well that about new rules/values. Nietzsche was quite smart. He
    declares to be apart from everything and that everyone should
    follow themselves, at the same time he declares new values and
    you get the feeling that you've came up with them by your own,
    following yourself.

    But i guess this is how most succesful memes work.

    PS: I don't want to offend your nietzsche-view, i just think that it's
    one of million different views and opinions.

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 28 2002 - 17:07:04 GMT